A Ventography!

Just two moms letting off some steam




1.  that Congress subpoena Dr. William Thompson and investigate the CDC fraud.

2. that Congress repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and hold manufacturers liable for injury caused by their vaccines.

3. that single measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines be made available immediately.

4. that all vaccines be classified as pharmaceutical drugs and tested accordingly.

Official Trailer – http://vaxxedthemovie.com/vaxxed-official-trailer/

For more information – http://vaxxedthemovie.com







“In 2013, biologist Dr. Brian Hooker received a call from a Senior Scientist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) who led the agency’s 2004 study on the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine and its link to autism.

The scientist, Dr. William Thompson, confessed that the CDC had omitted crucial data in their final report that revealed a causal relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism. Over several months, Dr. Hooker records the phone calls made to him by Dr. Thompson who provides the confidential data destroyed by his colleagues at the CDC.

Dr. Hooker enlists the help of Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the British gastroenterologist falsely accused of starting the anti-vax movement when he first reported in 1998 that the MMR vaccine may cause autism. In his ongoing effort to advocate for children’s health, Wakefield directs this documentary examining the evidence behind an appalling cover-up committed by the government agency charged with protecting the health of American citizens.

Interviews with pharmaceutical insiders, doctors, politicians, and parents of vaccine-injured children reveal an alarming deception that has contributed to the skyrocketing increase of autism and potentially the most catastrophic epidemic of our lifetime.”



This film is a documentary  about a cover-up. Please do not refuse to see the film because-

  1. You heard it is an “anti-vaccine”film.
  2. You read a negative review from a reviewer who has not even seen the film. 
  3. The media is slamming the film and the directors.

Please see the movie and form your own opinion. If you still disagree with what the movie has to say–that is your prerogative. I applaud you for being open minded enough to see it.


1 Comment


We are combining ideas from two articles we came across about mandatory participation in vaccine trials.

This idea burst on to the scene back in January of 2012 when Oxford University’s Susanne Sheehy and Joel Meyer wrote an article entitled Should Participation in Vaccine Clinical Trials be Mandated?  The article was published in the American Medical Association’s Virtual Mentor journal.

This week, we read an article/interview between Natural News and Dr. Blaylock outlining reasons against requiring mandatory participation in vaccine trials.

Below, we give a high level summary of what the articles said in favor of compulsory vaccination. Then, we summarize the arguments against compulsory vaccination.

As always, the links to the full articles are included at the end of our summary.

 Reasons Participation in Vaccine Trials Should be Mandated:
  • To date vaccination has saved many lives and has the potential to save millions more, especially if vaccines are developed against the “big three”: malaria, HIV, and TB.
  • The lack of animal models that can reliably predict vaccine efficacy means that development still unavoidably relies on testing of novel vaccines in healthy individuals.
  • In recent decades there has been a significant decline in the numbers of healthy volunteers who participate in clinical trials, a decline that has the potential to become a key rate-limiting factor in vaccine development.
  • “Someday there’s going to be a big pandemic and if the vaccine industry doesn’t have this machinery and this investment in its infrastructure it won’t be able to churn out the cure that saves us all from total death and destruction.”
  • For every one person that is killed from a vaccine trial, maybe a million people will be saved, thus it’s for the greater good of society.

Dr. Blaylock’s Response Against Compulsory Vaccination:

  • It’s a violation of the Nuremberg medical code that is supposed to protect the public against being experimental animals for governments or vaccine companies.
  • It’s against the founding principles of our country. It is not consistent with the values of a free republic, rather it is socialist in nature.
  • A lot of the damage done by vaccines is hidden from the general public because: the mainstream media doesn’t cover it and it’s extremely difficult for a parent to appear before the vaccine injury court, let alone to get a settlement.
    • Blaylock says that often (like with Gardasil) the serious complications of vaccines exceed the death rate from the disease we’re vaccinating against. If we, the public, had accurate data on vaccines injury/death, we would see that we are “…harming more people than benefit from the vaccine.”
  • Blaylock argues that we (the USA) do have the capability to respond to a mass pandemic, however, the vaccine makers likely would not make the huge profits they are used to unless the vaccines were mandatory.
  • Sticking vaccines into the muscle of our children’s arms and legs actually suppresses the immune system. It causes the immune system to switch to TH2 type cytokine production, which inhibits immunity and leaves you with little protection against viruses and bacteria.
    • Dr. Blaylock says if you look on the CDC site they’ll tell you, “…if a child gets a HIB vaccine, for the next two weeks, they’re much more likely to get HIB and to die from it than they would if you didn’t give them the vaccine.”
  • Blaylock says that we, the public, have been led to believe that vaccines have controlled epidemics, but in actuality, “The vaccine came out at the very end of the fall in these infections.  The reason is, when you get natural infections, over time the population develops massive immunity to the infection.”
  • Blaylock mentions a “secret conference” called the Simpsonwood Conference held in Georgia where big wigs from the vaccine industry met to discuss whether giving mercury containing vaccines caused neuro-developmental problems. They concluded that mercury containing vaccines did cause a problem. When the chairman of the committee heard the data, he said he no longer wanted his grandchild to be vaccinated. Blaylock feels this is a common occurrence… that the very people pushing vaccines do not allow themselves, or their loved ones, to be vaccinated because they have knowledge we (the general public) are not privy to.

Blaylock’s Public Challenge to Anyone Pushing Mandatory Vaccination:

  • We (the public) should be able to see the vaccine records of anyone pushing mandatory vaccination (to see if they actually have been vaccinated).
  • If they have not been vaccinated, they should be publicly vaccinated with “off the shelf” vaccines like our children are (not a specially formulated version of the vaccine that has the toxic ingredients removed).
  • He wants the heads of the vaccine making companies, and their Boards of Directors to be vaccinated with every vaccine they manufacture.
  • He believes that if all vaccine pushers had to respond to this challenge, we would hear a lot less about mandatory vaccinations.

Sources and More Information:








You heard the story of when and how I first realized Annie had autism. Now, I want to back up and tell the story of what happened prior to my night of Supernanny hell.

Annie had a rough birth experience. My epidural was turned up way too high causing her a lot of distress. Her umbilical cord was knotted and way too thin (diameter of a pencil when a normal cord should be the diameter of a finger). She was born with a MEGA cone head. I am talking Saturday Night Live Cone Head. The hospital staff, thinking they were doing me a favor, molded her head to look normal over the course of a few hours. Now I know they should have taught me how to gently mold her head to look normal over the course of a month. They applied way too much force to a newborn skull. All of these things, I believe, contributed to Annie developing Sensory Processing Disorder.

I didn’t notice her quirks because I was a first time mom and had no one else to compare her to. But my mom noticed right away.  “She’s so sensitive,” my mom kept saying. Gradually, I realized what she meant. Everything was too bright, too loud, too windy, and too itchy for Annie. But I found ways to work around it and as she got older, she seemed to be outgrowing it.

Cut to Annie as a one year old. She was the happiest baby ever. Just a bundle of smiles and laughs. So interactive and bright eyed. She could point to any animal, color, or body part you asked her about. She waved, blew kisses, and played games like “so big” and “peekaboo.” Strangers would routinely stop me and say, “Your baby was smiling and waving at me, so I just had to come and say hello.” Annie had hit all of her developmental milestones (crawling, walking, talking) right on time. This was one of the happiest times in my life. If only I had known what was to come… I would have cherished those moments even more.

Shortly after Annie’s first birthday, I took her to the pediatrician for her one year vaccinations. Prior vaccines made her develop a low grade fever, swelling at the injection site, crankiness, and sleep issues, so I wasn’t looking forward to our visit. Annie received the varicella (chicken pox) vaccine along with three others that day. Within 48 hours of receiving the shots, Annie came down with a full blown case of the chicken pox. “Very unusual,” her pediatrician said. But he told me there was no cause for alarm and I believed him. She got over the chicken pox after two weeks and all seemed well.

At 18 months, I took Annie to a Discovery Toy party with tons of other toddlers in my neighborhood. Twenty four hours later, Annie had a high fever and diarrhea. My baby’s second major illness. I figured she would recover in a week, but a week passed, then the next, then the next… I kept taking her to the pediatrician and calling to ask, “Is this normal? Is it okay that my daughter has had explosive diarrhea and a fever for a month?” I was informed that this was the normal course of rotavirus. It was NO BIG DEAL.

Finally, the diarrhea stopped and the fever went away and we had two glorious weeks… my sparkly, happy baby was back!

I took Annie to the park and she was filthy from playing with the other kids in the sand. Into the bath tub she went. I was scrubbing the dirt off her ear when I noticed… “That’s weird – what are those two puncture marks on the top of her ear? Are those fang marks?” I asked myself in horror. I started to panic. “What horrible creature bit my child?”

By the next morning, her ear had swollen to twice its normal size and turned purple. I gave Annie some breakfast and she promptly vomited. She had a fever and chills. I was now officially freaking out.

Back to the doctor we went. We all suspected this was the work of a brown recluse spider. But since nobody knew for sure, we were given a topical antibiotic cream and told once again, to let it take its course. “This is so close to her brain,” I told the doctor. “Will it affect her brain?” I asked. He chuckled and said I had nothing to worry about.

During the next 2 weeks, Annie’s ear looked completely disgusting. I was genuinely worried it was going to fall off. The tissue turned black and looked like it was rotting away. But somehow, my little trooper fought off the venom and eventually her body healed itself. Once again, Annie was back. Hooray!

We took it easy for a few weeks and stayed close to home. Then, a friend invited us to meet them for a play date at a local water park for children. Annie hadn’t been out of the house in weeks. She deserved to do something fun I told myself. I agreed to meet them there.

The kids had a blast running around in the four inches of standing water in their swim diapers. Occasionally, Annie would fall down and take a big sip of the water. I tried to explain to her why she shouldn’t drink the water, but it didn’t seem to register. I was disgusted, but I figured, don’t all kids drink gross water at some point in their life? I know I did and I survived.

By the time Annie was 20 months old she had dealt with:

  • Oxygen deprivation in utero
  • Head trauma at birth
  • Severe negative reaction to varicella (chicken pox) vaccine
  • Month long bout with rotavirus
  • Brown recluse spider bite

I believe it was all of these things together, occurring in a short period of time, that weakened Annie’s immune system to the verge of collapse. She was no longer able to deal with the insult to her health that came next, the “straw that broke the camel’s back.”

To be continued…

For Part 1 of Annie’s Story: https://ventography.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/the-super-nanny-episode-that-changed-my-life/

Leave a comment


“By signing into law AB 499 on Oct. 9, Gov. Jerry Brown declared war on California families. He took away the sacred right of mothers and fathers to raise their children as they see fit, seriously endangering the kids’ health — while enriching Merck, the Big Pharma drug company.”

What this means for parents:

  •  Boys and girls as young as 12 can be offered the vaccines without your knowledge by their doctor or school nurse. 
  • They may use scare tactics like telling your children if they don’t get the vaccines, they can get sick and die.

Bottom line: Your child could be given shots and you will never know.  This also means that you no longer have access to your child’s full medical records… you will only be able to request PARTS of your child’s heath records once they turn 12.  

Merck’s own site on the vaccine, Gardasil.com, explicitly warns:

Only a doctor or health care professional can decide if GARDASIL is right for you or your child.”

Since when did a 12 year old become a doctor? 

We do not think even the most mature 12 year old is ready to make a medical decision with potential long term health implications. 

Thank you State of California for making the wise decision that 6th graders are competent enough to read and properly digest this information, to fully understand the risks and benefits, and to make an informed consent decision.  This is another example of “a random act of stupidity”.

If the child has a negative reaction, will the doctor, school nurse, school district, state of California, or Merck care for the child and pay the bills that come along with that scenario? Of course not! 

It will be left to the parents (who had no say in vaccinating their child) to try to figure out what went wrong (since they may not even know their child received the shots) and then to care for their child, potentially for the rest of their life. Since parents will have all the responsibility, parents should be allowed to make all the decisions!